2015年中科院考博英語真題7

考博英語 責(zé)任編輯:王覓 2019-02-12

摘要:2015年中科院考博英語真題,更多關(guān)于考博英語的相關(guān)信息,請(qǐng)關(guān)注希賽網(wǎng)英語考試頻道。

希賽網(wǎng)英語頻道為同學(xué)們整理了中科院考博英語真題.請(qǐng)同學(xué)們多多復(fù)習(xí).專心備考。
Part B Reading Comprehension

Section B (20 minutes, 10 points)

Directions: In each ofthe following passages, five sentences have been removed from the original text. They are listed from A to F and put below the passage. Choose the most suitable sentence from the list to fill in each of the blanks (numbered 66 to 75). For each passage, there in one sentence that does not fit in any of the blanks. Mark your answers on your machine-scoring ANSWER SHEET.

Passage One

The Santa Ana appeals court upheld an earlier jury verdict awarding $ 3. 2 million in damages to Alexis Sarti who suffered serious nerve damage after a food poisoning episode at a restaurant. 66) In April 2005, Sarti ate raw tuna at the Salt Creek Grille restaurant. Afterwards, she suffered from sudden paralysis and double vision. She spent the next 49 days in the hospital, and had to drop out of college for more than a year and a half after the food poisoning incident, for medical care and therapy. 67) Muscles and spasms bother her on a daily basis, although she says she’s used to these now. She has recovered somewhat since then. But strenuous activity is out of the question, and what’s worse, she expects her situation to deteriorate as she gets older.

Sarti filed a lawsuit against the restaurant, and claimed cross contamination of the tuna with a form of bacteria that exists in raw poultry. 68) The verdict was set aside by Superior Court Judge Derek W. Hunt. The 4th District Court of Appeal in Santa Ana has now overturned Judge Hunt’s ruling.

In delivering his decision, Judge Hunt said he was constrained by a 35-year-old appellate decision that prohibits juries from assuming that cross contamination in the restaurants was the result of faulty practices of handling.

The Santa Ana appeals court seems to have disregarded that older appellate decision. 69) It has been cited for in^roper food storage, cross contamination and incorrect handling on three separate instances. It was clear that the negligent food handling practices at this restaurant were responsible for a deadly cross contamination that resulted in Sard’s food poisoning. 70) Still, she has incurred more than a million dollars worth of medical bills, and expects to need more medical care in the future.

A. At the trial , Sard’s attorneys argued that Salt Creek Grille has a record of poor handling practices in its kitchens.

B. Sarti said medical bills totaled about $ 1 million and she wants to put aside another $ 1 million for future expenses.

C. Sarti insists that the victory is a moral, rather than monetary one.

D. Once a high school cross country runner, Sarti today is unable to take part in sports like running, or other forms of extreme physical activity.

E. It’s a milestone decision that can now be cited across other food poisoning lawsuits.

F. A jury handed down a verdict for $ 3. 2 million, and Salt Creek Grille, which also has branches in New York and New Jersey, appealed.
點(diǎn)擊返回2015年中科院考博英語真題總卷<<<

考博英語自學(xué)神器中國科學(xué)院大學(xué)-希賽學(xué)習(xí)包

版權(quán)輔導(dǎo)教材+推薦自學(xué)計(jì)劃+在線智能題庫+知識(shí)點(diǎn)練習(xí)+入群共同學(xué)習(xí)+1-2年服務(wù)期

考博英語培訓(xùn)課程中國科學(xué)院-希賽課程

結(jié)合歷年考試真題,輔以相關(guān)理論知識(shí),以輕松、簡(jiǎn)化的語言教授,讓學(xué)生迅速掌握知識(shí)點(diǎn)及做題技巧。

小編推薦:

中國科學(xué)院2019考博英語初試時(shí)間及科目

中國科學(xué)院2019考博英語報(bào)名條件

中國科學(xué)院2019考博英語報(bào)名時(shí)間

中國科學(xué)院2019考博英語網(wǎng)上報(bào)名方式

加入希賽網(wǎng),獲取更多考博英語相關(guān)信息,真題解析

>>點(diǎn)擊注冊(cè)會(huì)員,享更多英語考試相關(guān)資料

更多資料
更多課程
更多真題
溫馨提示:因考試政策、內(nèi)容不斷變化與調(diào)整,本網(wǎng)站提供的以上信息僅供參考,如有異議,請(qǐng)考生以權(quán)威部門公布的內(nèi)容為準(zhǔn)!

考博英語備考資料免費(fèi)領(lǐng)取

去領(lǐng)取

專注在線職業(yè)教育23年

項(xiàng)目管理

信息系統(tǒng)項(xiàng)目管理師

廠商認(rèn)證

信息系統(tǒng)項(xiàng)目管理師

信息系統(tǒng)項(xiàng)目管理師

學(xué)歷提升

!
咨詢?cè)诰€老師!