摘要:以下是希賽網(wǎng)給大家分享考研201英語(一)在線題庫每日一練,希望通過刷題可以幫助大家鞏固重要知識點(diǎn),對知識點(diǎn)查漏補(bǔ)缺,祝愿大家能順利通過考試!
本文提供考研201英語(一)在線題庫每日一練,以下為具體內(nèi)容
1、Ancient Greek philosopher Aristotle viewed laughter as “a bodily exercise precious to health.” But(1)some claims to the contrary, laughing probably has little influence on physical fitness. Laughter does (2)short-term changes in the function of the heart and its blood vessels, (3) heart rate and oxygen consumption. But because hard laughter is difficult to (4), a good laugh is unlikely to have (5) benefits the way, say, walking or jogging does. (6), instead of straining muscles to build them, as exercise does, laughter apparently accomplishes the (7), studies dating back to the 1930's indicate that laughter (8) muscles, decreasing muscle tone for up to 45 minutes after the laugh dies down. Such bodily reaction might conceivably help (9) the effects of psychological stress. Anyway, the act of laughing probably does produce other types of (10) feedback, that improve an individual's emotional state. (11) one classical theory of emotion, our feelings are partially rooted (12) physical reactions. It was argued at the end of the 19th century that humans do not cry (13) they are sad but they become sad when the tears begin to flow. Although sadness also (14) tears, evidence suggests that emotions can flow (15) muscular responses. In an experiment published in 1988, social psychologist Fritz Strack of the University of Würzburg in Germany asked volunteers to (16) a pen either with their teeth—thereby creating an artificial smile—or with their lips, which would produce a(n)(17) expression. Those forced to exercise their smiling muscles(18) more enthusiastically to funny cartoons than did those whose months were contracted in a frown,(19) that expressions may influence emotions rather than just the other way around. (20), the physical act of laughter could improve mood.
問題1
A、among
B、except
C、despite
D、like
問題2
A、reflect
B、demand
C、indicate
D、produce
問題3
A、stabilizing
B、boosting
C、impairing
D、determining
問題4
A、transmit
B、sustain
C、evaluate
D、observe
問題5
A、measurable
B、manageable
C、affordable
D、renewable
問題6
A、In turn
B、In fact
C、In addition
D、In brief
問題7
A、opposite
B、impossible
C、average
D、expected
問題8
A、hardens
B、weakens
C、tightens
D、relaxes
問題9
A、aggravate
B、generate
C、moderate
D、enhance
問題10
A、physical
B、mental
C、subconscious
D、internal
問題11
A、Except for
B、According to
C、Due to
D、As for
問題12
A、with
B、on
C、in
D、at
問題13
A、unless
B、until
C、if
D、because
問題14
A、exhausts
B、follows
C、precedes
D、suppresses
問題15
A、into
B、from
C、towards
D、beyond
問題16
A、fetch
B、bite
C、pick
D、hold
問題17
A、disappointed
B、excited
C、joyful
D、indifferent
問題18
A、adapted
B、catered
C、turned
D、reacted
問題19
A、suggesting
B、requiring
C、mentioning
D、supposing
問題20
A、Eventually
B、Consequently
C、Similarly
D、Conversely
2、A deal is a deal-except, apparently, when Entergy is involved. The company, a major energy supplier in New England, provoked justified outrage in Vermont last week when it announced it was reneging on a longstanding commitment to abide by the strict nuclear regulations. Instead, the company has done precisely what it had long promised it would not challenge the constitutionality of Vermont's rules in the federal court, as part of a desperate effort to keep its Vermont Yankee nuclear power plant running. It's a stunning move. The conflict has been surfacing since 2002, when the corporation bought Vermont's only nuclear power plant, an aging reactor in Vernon. As a condition of receiving state approval for the sale, the company agreed to seek permission from state regulators to operate past 2012. In 2006, the state went a step further, requiring that any extension of the plant's license be subject to Vermont legislature's approval. Then, too, the company went along. Either Entergy never really intended to live by those commitments, or it simply didn't foresee what would happen next. A string of accidents, including the partial collapse of a cooling tower in 2007 and the discovery of an underground pipe system leakage, raised serious questions about both Vermont Yankee's safety and Entergy's management—especially after the company made misleading statements about the pipe. Enraged by Entergy's behavior, the Vermont Senate voted 26 to 4 last year against allowing an extension. Now the company is suddenly claiming that the 2002 agreement is invalid because of the 2006 legislation, and that only the federal government has regulatory power over nuclear issues. The legal issues in the case are obscure: whereas the Supreme Court has ruled that states do have some regulatory authority over nuclear power, legal scholars say that Vermont case will offer a precedent-setting test of how far those powers extend. Certainly, there are valid concerns about the patchwork regulations that could result if every state sets its own rules. But had Entergy kept its word, that debate would be beside the point. The company seems to have concluded that its reputation in Vermont is already so damaged that it has noting left to lose by going to war with the state. But there should be consequences. Permission to run a nuclear plant is a public trust. Entergy runs 11 other reactors in the United States, including Pilgrim Nuclear station in Plymouth. Pledging to run Pilgrim safely, the company has applied for federal permission to keep it open for another 20 years. But as the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) reviews the company's application, it should keep it mind what promises from Entergy are worth. 1.The phrase “reneging on”(Line 2. para.1) is closest in meaning to( ).2.By entering into the 2002 agreement, Entergy intended to ( ). 3.According to Paragraph 4, Entergy seems to have problems with it ( ). 4.In the author's view, the Vermont case will test ( ). 5.It can be inferred from the last paragraph that( ).
問題1
A、condemning
B、reaffirming
C、dishonoring
D、securing
問題2
A、obtain protection from Vermont regulators
B、seek favor from the federal legislature
C、acquire an extension of its business license
D、get permission to purchase a power plant
問題3
A、managerial practices
B、technical innovativeness
C、financial goals
D、business vision
問題4
A、Entergy's capacity to fulfill all its promises
B、the mature of states' patchwork regulations
C、the federal authority over nuclear issues
D、the limits of states' power over nuclear issues
問題5
A、Entergy's business elsewhere might be affected
B、the authority of the NRC will be defied
C、Entergy will withdraw its Plymouth application
D、Vermont's reputation might be damaged
3、People are, on the whole, poor at considering background information when making individual decisions. At first glance this might seem like a strength that (1) the ability to make judgments which are unbiased by (2) factors. But Dr. Uri Simonsohn speculated that an inability to consider the big (3) was leading decision-makers to be biased by the daily samples of information they were working with. (4), he theorised that a judge (5) of appearing too soft (6) crime might be more likely to send someone to prison (7) he had already sentenced five or six other defendants only to forced community service on that day.To (8) this idea, he turned to the university-admissions process. In theory, the (9) of an applicant should not depend on the few others (10) randomly for interview during the same day, but Dr Simonsohn suspected the truth was (11).He studied the results of 9,323 MBA interviews (12) by 31 admissions officers. The interviewers had (13) applicants on a scale of one to five. This scale (14) numerous factors into consideration. The scores were (15) used in conjunction with an applicant’s score on the Graduate Management Admission Test, or GMAT, a standardised exam which is (16) out of 800 points, to make a decision on whether to accept him or her.Dr Simonsonh found if the score of the previous candidate in a daily series of interviewees was 0.75 points or more higher than that of the one (17) that, then the score for the next applicant would (18) by an average of 0.075 points. This might sound small, but to (19) the effects of such a decrease a candidate would need 30 more GMAT points than would otherwise have been (20).
問題1
A、grants
B、submits
C、transmits
D、delivers
問題2
A、minor
B、objective
C、crucial
D、external
問題3
A、issue
B、vision
C、picture
D、moment
問題4
A、For example
B、On average
C、In principle
D、Above all
問題5
A、fond
B、fearful
C、capable
D、thoughtless
問題6
A、in
B、on
C、to
D、for
問題7
A、if
B、until
C、though
D、unless
問題8
A、promote
B、emphasize
C、share
D、test
問題9
A、decision
B、quality
C、status
D、success
問題10
A、chosen
B、studied
C、found
D、identified
問題11
A、exceptional
B、defensible
C、replaceable
D、otherwise
問題12
A、inspired
B、expressed
C、conducted
D、secured
問題13
A、assigned
B、rated
C、matched
D、arranged
問題14
A、put
B、got
C、gave
D、took
問題15
A、instead
B、then
C、ever
D、rather
問題16
A、selected
B、passed
C、marked
D、introduced
問題17
A、before
B、after
C、above
D、below
問題18
A、jump
B、float
C、drop
D、fluctuate
問題19
A、achieve
B、undo
C、maintain
D、disregard
問題20
A、promising
B、possible
C、necessary
D、helpful
4、As many people hit middle age, they often start to notice that their memory and mental clarity are not what they used to be. We suddenly can't remember(1)we put the keys just a moment ago, or an old acquaintance's name, or the name of an old band we used to love. As the brain(2), we refer to these occurrences as “senior moments.”(3)seemingly innocent, this loss of mental focus can potentially have a(n)(4)impact on our professional, social, and personal(5).Neuroscientists, experts who study the nervous system, are increasingly showing that there's actually a lot that can be done. It (6)out that the brain needs exercise in much the same way our muscles do, and the right mental (7)can significantly improve our basic cognitive(8). Thinking is essentially a (9) of making connections in the brain. To a certain extent, our ability to (10) in making the connections that drive intelligence is inherited. (11), because these connections are made through effort and practice, scientists believe that intelligence can expand and fluctuate (12) mental effort.Now, a new Web-based company has taken it a step (13) and developed the first “brain training program” designed to actually help people improve and regain their mental (14).The Web-based program (15) you to systematically improve your memory and attention skills. The program keeps (16) of your progress and provides detailed feedback (17) your performance and improvement. Most importantly, it (18) modifies and enhances the games you play to (19) on the strengths you are developing—much like a(n) (20) exercise routine requires you to increase resistance and vary your muscle use.
問題1
A、why
B、when
C、that
D、where
問題2
A、improves
B、fades
C、collapses
D、recovers
問題3
A、While
B、Unless
C、Once
D、If
問題4
A、uneven
B、limited
C、damaging
D、obscure
問題5
A、relationship
B、environment
C、wellbeing
D、outlook
問題6
A、turns
B、finds
C、points
D、figures
問題7
A、responses
B、roundabouts
C、workouts
D、associations
問題8
A、genre
B、criterion
C、circumstances
D、functions
問題9
A、channel
B、process
C、sequence
D、condition
問題10
A、excel
B、feature
C、persist
D、believe
問題11
A、However
B、Moreover
C、Otherwise
D、Therefore
問題12
A、instead of
B、regardless of
C、apart from
D、according to
問題13
A、back
B、further
C、aside
D、around
問題14
A、framework
B、stability
C、sharpness
D、flexibility
問題15
A、hurries
B、reminds
C、forces
D、allows
問題16
A、order
B、track
C、hold
D、pace
問題17
A、to
B、on
C、for
D、with
問題18
A、constantly
B、habitually
C、irregularly
D、unusually
問題19
A、carry
B、put
C、build
D、take
問題20
A、risky
B、familiar
C、idle
D、effective
5、In order to “change lives for the better” and reduce “dependency,” George Osborne, Chancellor of the Exchequer, introduced the “upfront work search” scheme. Only if the jobless arrive at the jobcentre with a CV, register for online job search, and start looking for work will they be eligible for benefit—and then they should report weekly rather than fortnightly. What could be more reasonable?More apparent reasonableness followed. There will now be a seven-day wait for the jobseeker's allowance. “Those first few days should be spent looking for work, not looking to sign on,” he claimed. “We’re doing these things because we know they help people stay off benefits and help those on benefits get into work faster.” Help? Really? On first hearing, this was the socially concerned chancellor, trying to change lives for the better, complete with “reforms” to an obviously indulgent system that demands too little effort from the newly unemployed to find work, and subsidises laziness. What motivated him, we were to understand, was his zeal for “fundamental fairness”—protecting the taxpayer, controlling spending and ensuring that only the most deserving claimants received their benefits.Losing a job is hurting: you don't skip down to the jobcentre with a song in your heart, delighted at the prospect of doubling your income from the generous state. It is financially terrifying, psychologically embarrassing and you know that support is minimal and extraordinarily hard to get. You are now not wanted; you are now excluded from the work environment that offers purpose and structure in your life. Worse, the crucial income to feed yourself and your family and pay the bills has disappeared. Ask anyone newly unemployed what they want and the answer is always: a job.But in Osbomeland, your first instinct is to fall into dependency—permanent dependency if you can get it—supported by a state only too ready to indulge your falsehood. It is as though 20 years of ever tougher reforms of the job search and benefit administration system never happened. The principle of British welfare is no longer that you can insure yourself against the risk of unemployment and receive unconditional payments if the disaster happens. Even the very phrase “jobseeker's allowance” is about redefining the unemployed as a “jobseeker” who had no fundamental right to a benefit he or she has earned through making national insurance contributions. Instead, the claimant receives a time-limited “allowance,” conditional on actively seeking a job; no entitlement and no insurance, at $71.70 a week, one of the least generous in the EU. 1.George Osborne's scheme was intended to( ).2.The phrase “to sign on”(Paragraph 2) most probably means ( ). 3.What prompted the chancellor to develop his scheme?4.According to Paragraph 3, being unemployed makes one feel ( ). 5.To which of the following would the author most probably agree?
問題1
A、motivate the unemployed to report voluntarily
B、provide the unemployed with easier access to benefits
C、encourage jobseekers, active engagement in job seeking
D、guarantee jobseekers' legitimate right to benefits
問題2
A、to register for an allowance from the government
B、to accept the government's restrictions on the allowance
C、to check on the availability of jobs at the jobcentre
D、to attend a governmental job-training program
問題3
A、A desire to secure a better life for all.
B、An eagerness to protect the unemployed.
C、An urge to be generous to the claimants.
D、A passion to ensure fairness for taxpayers.
問題4
A、insulted
B、uneasy
C、enraged
D、guilty
問題5
A、Unemployment benefits should not be made conditional.
B、The British welfare system indulges jobseekers' laziness.
C、The jobseekers' allowance has met their actual needs.
D、Osborne's reforms will reduce the risk of unemployment.
點(diǎn)擊查看【完整】試卷>>考研備考資料免費(fèi)領(lǐng)取
去領(lǐng)取
共收錄117.93萬道題
已有25.02萬小伙伴參與做題